Skip to main content

Reply to this post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: Spamalope Date: Apr 29, 2009 3:18pm
Forum: etree Subject: additional extraneous file uploaded

Accidentally included in my ftp batch was an extra file which should be deleted from the item on archive.

http://www.archive.org/details/pz2009-04-25.zoomH2.aud

I found it while I was giving each track name and information, but didn't see any option for deleting the actual file. Currently the item is creating the derivatives, but it shouldn't be anywhere in the item, including inthe derivative zip files.

It's called "ERROR - DELETE THIS FILE"
the actual filename was pz2009-04-251t-08 (or something similiar)

Let me know if this can be salvaged.
thanks!

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Spamalope Date: Apr 29, 2009 3:23pm
Forum: etree Subject: Re: additional extraneous file uploaded

Also it appears that the songs in the file listing are not in order. The setlist in "Description" is accurate.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: greenone Date: Apr 29, 2009 5:23pm
Forum: etree Subject: Re: additional extraneous file uploaded

You can delete the extraneous file by going to edit item > item manager > checkout. That will open the FTP so you can delete the file.

The files are out of order on the page because of the way you named them. You should use two-digit numbering so that they go 01, 02, 03...08, 09, 10. Otherwise, it'll sort 1, 10, 2, 3, 4, etc.

So while you have it checked out on the FTP, rename your files properly, delete the md5 and ffp's, then post back here and we'll do the rest.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Spamalope Date: Apr 29, 2009 6:05pm
Forum: etree Subject: Re: additional extraneous file uploaded

Renamed all the flacs, vbr and ogg files. deleted the ffp's and md5.

Normally I don't make the 1 vs 01 mistake! That's why i guess I didn't catch it.

thanks!

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: greenone Date: Apr 29, 2009 8:12pm
Forum: etree Subject: Re: additional extraneous file uploaded

Wouldn't have even been a problem if it weren't for that track 10 on the first disk. :)

Queueing up a re-derive right now...